Higher current reserves, and vastly different DAMPING FACTORS (>1100:1 Vs. >150:1 on the older amps) and allows the A21 and A52+ to seize control of the woofers and drive them as they should be driven. I was talking with Polk65 and he said it is not far from where he lives. Pro amp for sure, but a 61 lbs class AB amp you and I both know there is something fishy about this one. The Anthem amp will integrate nicely with the MRX receiver, but not necessarily better. From available pictures it looks like it has 10X8,200 uf or 82,000 uf filter capacitance total. Add to cart. Then Anthem is Class AB. It is a beautiful, muscle car of an amplifier, with sports car engineering. Copyright 2000-2023 M2N Limited E. & O.E. Now Available: Tech Talk Podcast with Scott Wilkinson, Episode 19 Click here for details. If you really need that much power, class D amps will be your friends, look to Hypex, Purifi etc. it speaks of thoughtful craftsmanship. They really are nice, with no sign of wobble or flimsiness. Ill give that a shot to see if that solves things. JTRs with that much power is a bit insane IMO. Anthem 225 vs Parasound A21 vs Emotiva Xpa 7 Gen 2 Hey guys, I am looking for a very detailed sounding amp for Sacd playback.I am not interested in power output ,just smooth natural sound.These are my choices so far. It will be here sometime next week. I currently have and will use the Yamaha CX-A5100 Processor. It looks like it has 2X10 A slow blo fuses, that indicate it has two transformers with VA rating up to 750 VA each but not larger. Planning on using dual Captivator 2400s. MCA 225 features 3 year warranty Delivers lower THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) for cleaner, pure sound and lower noise Completely redesigned for improved audio performance and reliability Higher current output for lower distortion Cosmetic match for AVM 60 AV Preamplifier-Processor Improved Advanced Load Monitoring system another amp in the price range works great with M&K. I'd love to hear them. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Either is a good choice though. there's no way to tell the difference without testing it in your system. However, having separate Pre and Power usually leads to positive result. I've got both and love them both. I looked up the spec on the speaker, and unless you have a monster size room, 4 ohm at 91db isn't that huge of a load. Hard to say, I can think of the following spec highlights for comparison, and you'll be the judge: Ah man Peng, major thanks for a detailed replied, that must of taken you a while to type up and research, I would buy you a drink if I could. Available in 5, 3 and 2-channel configurations, these new MCA amplifiers feature more robust and efficient power and heavy-duty reliability. Parasound is famous because of John Curl, as for Anthem, they have been in business for a long time. Click here to email us, or call for advice on 0121 224 7300/7401 (9am to 5:30pm GMT Mon-Sat) I found something from Anthem last night that said special circumstances required for 2ohm test. As long as this amplifier isn't expected to perform to the level of a $2000 plus amp and you don't demand high volume from tough-to-drive speakers, this is a wonderful amp. Here is a list of companies that make units with IcePower amps.. Of the two amps you mention in the original post, go with the Parasound. Introduction: What Is the Anthem MCA 525 Generation 2? The new Anthem MCA amps all have identical amp boards for every channel. fatstrat New Member Thread Starter Joined Feb 21, 2020 Messages 8 Location Pa More Your Yamaha CX-A5100 will work just fine. I know that a Parasound Halo A31 would trump both of them but that is less channels and a little too much coin. By all accounts the Anthem 1120 is one of, if not the, best receiver on the market with plenty enough power? Of the three, go with the Parasound A51 to match with the Studios.. Having owned several Paradigm speakers and Parasound amps in different configurations, they are a near perfect match. Not a great way to scratch the itch. Available in 5, 3, and 2-channel configurations, these new MCA amplifiers feature more robust and efficient power and heavy-duty reliability. There is a 20% sale off on Anthem right now making the Anthem MCA 525 at $2,799. Thanks! It may not display this or other websites correctly. Whether that's worth the change to you, don't know. For evaluation I used the same demo material that Id listened to during my testing of the AVM 90 with my Hypex NCore-based amplifiers. So, for example, an 8 ohm speaker might have impedance dips below 4 ohms, or a 4 ohm speaker might dip below that, which can prove challenging for some amplifiers. I briefly owned an AVM60 as a potential replacement for my Classe SSP800, but unfortunately was no match in sound quality so I sold it. I had forgotten about these. Thank you for the adviceit is appreciated! Both, based on specs are no better than the AVR-X3700H, SR6014, and much worse than the X3600H measured by ASR, but I guess only golden ears know the difference in use. Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Class 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2. Sheeuut! A forum community dedicated to home theater owners and enthusiasts. Yet for Anthem fans, particularly AVM 70 or AVM 90 owners, there is a lot to love here. I think the closest company to me that I really care about is VPI but I can never find it when I used to travel to that area. As stated before, your Anthem receiver is well known for sound quality and excellent performance overall, so stepping up to a larger amp would definitely help fill a larger room without strain and maintain excellent sound quality. In truth, it should have more power as the 2205 retailed for $2500 compared to $799 for the Emotiva. Must be the local Bay Area influence. There is, however, a but as 3,895 is a sizable wad of cash for a five-channel amplifier. Obviously, the McIntosh is considerably more then the other two. To complement the NEW AVM 90 and 70 A/V Processors, Anthem introduces the new MCA 525, 325 and 225 GEN 2 power amplifiers. To complement the NEW AVM 90 and AVM 70 A/V Processors, Anthem introduces the new MCA 525, 325, and 225 GEN 2 power amplifiers. Obviously, the McIntosh is considerably more then the other two. MCA 525 has worse numbers in the following: Slew rate: 30 V /second <1% THD at rated output Channel separation, 100 Hz to 10 kHz >65 dB Vs A51's Inter channel Crosstalk > 78 dB at 1 kHz > 63 dB at 20 kHz so I would say the A51's a lot better based on the typical shapes of XT vs freq., that the MCA's would likely be a few dB worse at 20 kHz. 1 Home Entertainment Tech Resource. Surround ADP 590. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Bear in mind when reading this that many speakers have a minimum impedance far lower than the manufacturers stated nominal impedance. You must log in or register to reply here. This second generation of MCA multi-channel Class A/B power amplifiers builds on that reputation, although represents a complete ground-up redesign of the forgoing MCA series. . What's not to like? The Studio 590 uses the technology that JBL engineers developed for pro-audio loudspeakers to deliver accurate, powerful sound to your living room. I'm going to try a Parasound again (HCA-2200ii). The MCA 525 took firm grip of my speakers as the familiar kick-drum beat filled the room, sounding punchy and dynamic, while every resonance of Lindsey Buckinghams dobro guitar played out across a deep front soundstage. You must log in or register to reply here. "Let our rigorous testing and reviews be your guidelines to A/V equipment not marketing slogans", Get our latest product reviews and AV stories emailed to you weekly. Its built like a tank yet looks sophisticated from the front. Related products McIntosh MI254 $ 5,000.00 Meridian G65 $ 5,500.00 Datasat LS10 They're both 400 watts into 4 ohms. The new MCA Series delivers lower THD (total harmonic distortion) for more clean, pure sound and lower noise for a supremely quiet background. In the Sound&Vision test of the 1120, it measured 218.4 watts per channel with 2 channels driven simultaneously into 4 ohms. Nothing here anymore. British company IOTAVX knock it out the park! Need help with floorspeakers and subwoofer configuration, Recommendations for Side, Rear, and Center Speaker Stands, 2.2 kVA encapsulated toroid power transformer with independent, 164,000 F power supply filter capacitance, input impedance 47 k unbalanced; 94 k balanced, ACD 250 W/400 W, 8/4 Ohms, 0.2% THD at full power. Well, thanks for all the input. Please Help! I'd just use the A51 and not worry about it. Its worth pausing here briefly to note the quality of the binding posts. This robust construction extends to the interior, which uses large, high-quality capacitors and high-current bipolar output transistors, and features a generally tidy signal path. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community. If a speaker is naturally fatiguing by nature and design (the Klipsch RF-7 III's come to mind, seemed to have lots of bass and highs but no mids) then can EQ'ing adjust for this? https://www.anthemav.com/downloads/Anthem-MCA-525-325-225-Gen-2-081020.pdf, https://www.anthemav.com/products-archived/model=mca-525/page=specs, Need help with floorspeakers and subwoofer configuration, Recommendations for Side, Rear, and Center Speaker Stands. I even ended up calling them and leaving a message, and still nothing. I guess the only major concern I have with amps is ending up with one that would make my speakers brighter then my AVR. The A51 weighs more and is Class A / AB. Stereo setup: MSB Select ll DAC w/ 2 separate mono powerbases (PSU) & Femto 33 clock, Taeko Audio SGM Extreme music server; Clearaudio Statement v2 turntable, Statement TT tonearm, Statement Goldfinger cartridge & separate PSU; D'Agostino Momentum phono pre; Naim Statement NAC S1 linestage preamp & Naim Statement NAP S1 monoblock amps; Magico M6. In addition, compression drivers aren't made for residential use. 2. I voted for Anthem because its the cheaper of the 2 options. Anthem MCA 525 Gen 2 or Parasound A52+ (Decision Made) ar surround Jul 20, 2021 Help Support QuadraphonicQuad: ar surround 2K Club - QQ Super Nova QQ Supporter Joined Apr 3, 2010 Messages 4,255 Location New Joisey Jul 20, 2021 #1 I have decided to purchase a new 5 channel power amp and would like some advice from our forum members. Some say they don't build amps like they used to, but technology has improved exponentially over time too. I tested the MCA 525 connected via XLR to the AVM 90 that I had in for evaluation at the time. Well I added a Rotel RMB 1555 amp to my Pioneer SC 57 receiver and don't regret it. If you are concerned about heat though, want more power (that you may or may not need), and more value while maintaining high build/sounds quality, you could look at one of these: https://www.d-sonic.com/amplifiers/multi-channel/three-channel/ I currently have and will use the Yamaha CX-A5100 Processor. Camel Air Born: The MCA & Decca Years 1973-1984 (box set with 5 albums in 5.1 on blu-ray), MMH - New Atmos Decoder (beta) discussion, Multichannel Media Players, File Storage & Ripping, Tears For Fears "The Hurting" (SDE Blu-Ray #9 with Steven Wilson 5.1 & Dolby Atmos mixes! So, for the first 8 Watts of power, which exceeds the typical average power requirements for music, the output transistors are always on. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. 7.2.4Dolby ATMOS / The WaveSystemANTHEM AVM-60ANTHEM MCA-325ANTHEM MCA-525OPPO UDP-205B&W CT 7.3 + 7.4 + 7.5ELAC . Those are some pretty kickass speakers. Speakers? For rig details, see my profile. Looking at it from the top, one can see its oversized black aluminium heatsinks through the casing. JavaScript is disabled. Im going to go out on a limb and say there probably isnt much in existence that is a true upgrade to the Parasound A51. Yup. McIntosh 255 vs Parasound Halo A51 vs Anthem MCA 525, The world's largest high-end audio community. As to that power, the Anthem is rated at (continuous) 225W into 8 ohms, 400W into 4 ohms, and an impressive 600W into 2 ohms. Read about our review ethos and the meaning of our review badges. Anthem MCA 525 GEN 2 Power Amplifier. Just curious why you're adding an external amplifier? But given differences in how they are specified by the manufactures, I deduce that the Anthem and the Parasound are somewhat closer in actual output capabilities. The MCA 525s overall construction is one of tremendous heft and solidity, as though it were hewn from an anvil. Mind me asking how you ever got your hands on that BBQ? 5-channel power amplifier; 225 watts per channel continuous power into 8 ohms. The huge transformers make themselves quickly apparent the moment one attempts lifting the MCA 525, which weighs in at a hulking 27.5kg, most of which is distributed at its front end. It was probably plugged into a modified Delorean when that test was performed. The Anthem has specs for 2 ohms, the Parasound doesn't. The A51 has better damping factor, but the Anthem has better SNR. The Anthem Mca 225 has THD+N of 0.05%, while the Parasound A21 has THD+N of 0.03%. That's great feedback. It might be ok for folks who mostly watch movies, but I spend 90% listening to music, so sound quality is #1 priority for me. Anthem's MCA 525 Power Amplifier is the flagship of the extraordinary MCA range which focuses on a single goal of obtaining leadership through innovation and technology. You are using an out of date browser. Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint. The one notable practical difference was that the MCA 525 has higher voltage gain (29dB) than my amps (26dB), which meant I turned the volume up slightly less for a given SPL. With the Marantz had in a tall cabinet with amps on then bottom, now with a Anthem I have the credenza version of stand (it is long and short with TV above) the amps are still one above the other. Anthem seems to be more assosicated with HT use, but the MCA-20 seems to be a pretty healthy 2ch amp, stable down to 2ohm. The MCA 525 Gen 2 is a fantastically clean sounding amplifier, which renders detailed audio even at low volumes. Available in 5, 3 and 2-channel configurations, these new MCA amplifiers feature more robust and efficient power and heavy-duty reliability. I. At 3,895, the price of entry for this performance is perhaps a touch too steep. To comment on what you've read here, click the Discussion tab and post a reply. I don't want to introduce harshness to the mix at all. Pro amps are often capable of 2 ohm, it's a bit unusual in consumer amps, tho. Of the three, go with the Parasound A51 to match with the Studios.. Having owned several Paradigm speakers and Parasound amps in different configurations, they are a near perfect match. I'd put the old Anthem amps (with the exception of the tubed input stage hybrid design) more on par with Rotel during the time period they were built than Parasound, meaning a slight notch below Parasound's HCA series in build and sound quality. I currently have and will use the Yamaha CX-A5100 Processor. Have the Halos in cabinet with open back and the front has perforations (to allow IR signal to pass etc). . Very tempting but I live in apartment and already have trouble with storing existing gears where am I going to put these? I guess you can make the highs softer but will that work to reduce ear fatigue? Speakers and subs! Thanks for the feedback. The Emotiva XPA-11 Gen3 11-channel power amplifier brings plenty of American muscle to your system thanks to the company's modular design and SMPS technology. Not too impressed by that. I would personally look at your preamp before the amp, especially because of the amps youre considering. Thats a great idea to isolate the variables. Congrats Bill! The latest MCA Power Amplifiers are available in two (MCA 225), three (MCA 325) and five (MCA 525) channel configurations and are designed to be a perfect match for the AVM 70 and AVM 90 AV Processors both sonically and aesthetically. Parasound A51 (click on specs) https://parasound.com/a51.php Anthen MCA 525 Gen2 (PDF spec download) Is this something that any system can benefit from or is it inherant to Parasound products? Which ones? I'd try hooking the center channel output of the receiver to a different (known good) channel on your amplifier. .120 dB Vs A51's 112 dB IHF A-weighted (Note: no idea what IHF is, probably an old standard, so this may be be an apples to apples comparison). It seems a trivial thing to note, but I always find it reassuring when I see good quality binding posts; it speaks of thoughtful craftsmanship. Gear: Rotel RC 1082, Rotel RSP 1068 pre/pro, Rotel RMB1077 amp, Cayin CDT 15a CD player, S301 bluray. Looking purely at the published specifications, I would guess they are more alike than different. I have an Anthem AVM 60 with Halo A51 and A23, the Halo sounds great with the Anthem. 3. It is a beautiful, muscle car of an amplifier, with sports car engineering. So 180W of Anthem should be good. I ran through the same demo scenes in John Wick (the bathhouse shootout), Oblivion (the opening scene) and Ready Player One (the race scene), and in every respect the MCAs audio performance was outstanding. I agree with you on the high levels they might achieve and your hearing.but there are many compression drivers used in home audio, I am right now using a set of speakers with such. Cool. those that are not welcome.well let`s just say they won`t be leaving the same way they arrived ! You will go farther in performance doing it this way than the latter. For Sale: JBL Studio 590's brand new, Local pickup, no separating. Anthem's MCA 525 Gen 2 power amplifier is a sophisticated piece of engineering from the Canadians. Hi mates, what external power amplifier would you guys recommend between the Anthem MCA 525 and Parasound A52+? Looking to replace my Yamaha MX-A5000 with one of the above 5 Channel Amplifiers. So not exactly full range. The MCA 225, 325, and 525 are designed to compliment the new AVM 70 and AVM 90 A/V Processors from Anthem. What a difference a clean, high current 250+ watt amp makes with my Mirage! Register today and take advantage of membership benefits. I briefly owned an AVM60 as a potential replacement for my Classe SSP800, but unfortunately was no match in sound quality so I sold it. Europe's busiest forums, with independent news and expert reviews, for TVs, Home Cinema, Hi-Fi, Movies, Gaming, Tech and more. Whilst not exactly A/B side-by-side testing, I reasoned that the comparison might bring to light any obvious differences in audio performance. These JTRS are rated down to 30 hz, and I know many tower speakers are and it's always recommended to crossover at 80hz for numerous and various reasons and let the subs do the heavy lifting, but there are towers with 6" drivers rated down to 30hz, and then there's JTRs with dual 12" drivers rated down to 30hz, surely it'll be good to use those 12" drivers and not waste them, I have a MiniDSP to smoothen out response and integrate them with subs, but will 400 wpc be enough for the lower frequencies, surely lower frequencies use more power than that calculator would suggest? Add to Cart. . Not much to base amp needs on. Lol so that website says, with 2 speakers, 101 sensitively, 1 watt amp power and distance of 12 feet, I'll get 95 decibels of sound. I have decided to purchase a new 5 channel power amp and would like some advice from our forum members. I can't believe they would rate the MCA525 2 ohms, that's not believable, not without caveat. Lots of other choices if youre thinking about buying one but if youve already got it and it functions well leave it to your kids when you die! The ability of the A21 and the A52+ to better render the bass content most likely comes from two things. High end baby. Anthem's new MCA Power Amplifiers are available in 2, 3 and 5 channel configurations and would be a great match for the AVM70 and AVM90 A/V Processors that we recently previewed. NAD's latest Master Series power amplifier delivers seven channels of Class D grunt thanks to Purifi's new Eigentakt technology. It is a 5-channel power amplifier using 225 watts per channel of continuous power into 8 ohm and is designed, engineered and manufactured in Canada. Overall, the Anthem MCA 525 was just a little smoother from top to bottom at high volumes, but the NAD does provide two additional channels for only $500 more -- a not insignificant difference if you're contemplating a seven-channel system. You are using an out of date browser. The A21 in particular is an absolute beauty and one of the best power amps on the market. Any input? Perfect passthrough of Ultra HD signals at up to 18.2 Gbps with Dolby Vision, HDR or Hybrid Log Gamma ensures optimal presentation of your visual media. Of the three, go with the Parasound A51 to match with the Studios.. Having owned several Paradigm speakers and Parasound amps in different configurations, they are a near perfect match. Anthem | MCA 525 GEN 2 | Overview (anthemav.com) "Higher Power into More Demanding Loads While most 5-channel amplifiers use a single power supply for front left and right channels and another power supply of the centre and surround, the new MCA 525 GEN 2 shares its two power supplies between all channels. Looking to replace my Yamaha MX-A5000 with one of the above 5 Channel Amplifiers. As the BBC Formula 1 bassline kicked in, each note hung in the air momentarily then decayed clearly and with tonal accuracy. That's a lot being shared but not very much compared to the likes of the Monolith, Outlaw and Parasound amps that don't share or at least not to the same extent for all channels (. The Fora platform includes forum software by XenForo. I read a couple books, suprised I can read huh. . You must log in or register to reply here. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. I dont think its an upgrade to get the Anthem if you already own the Parasound though. Anthem has announced the newest versions of its high-end multichannel home theatre and music audio hardware with the launch of the new MRX 540, MRX 740 and MRX 1140 AV Receivers, the AVM 70 and AVM 90 AV Processors and three GEN2 power amplifiers in the form of the MCA 225, MCA 325 and MCA 525 amps. Great post, looking at the Emotiva, Anthem and ATI two-channel amps myself. Another good choice is Parasound, the A51 and A21. I give Parasound a plug, but sorry I haven't heard both. The sensitivity does vary with frequency (and sensitivity measurements don't generally include lower bass), and lower frequencies could well demand a bit more power. All I gotta say is WOW! The Rotel 1585 is $3,000. http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=855660&highlight=d-sonic, Need help with floorspeakers and subwoofer configuration, Recommendations for Side, Rear, and Center Speaker Stands. I've owned 1xHCA 2200II and 3xHCA 1200II's. The MCA 525 is evidently capable of attack and delicacy with music and provides detail in spades, even at levels lower than Id typically listen at. CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. I have decided to purchase a 5 channel amp and like the Parasound HCA-2205AT, but haven't quite figured out what the differences are between the Anthem PVA or MCA models. Rear connections allow both XLRs and RCAs. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. The MCA 525 turned in a similarly accomplished performance with my other test songs. Support your locals eh? I have a full 7.2.4 Canton system, with Ventos 896, 866, 876 + Atelier 900 as Back and 4x Inceiling 980, 2x XTZ 1x12 subs, and a Marantz SR7012 AVR. Being designed to accompany the AVM series, the MCA 525 will pair perfectly with the new processors, so AVM owners neednt trouble themselves thinking about gain structure. What are they? Like all Anthem products the MCA 525, MCA 325 and MCA 225 . It might mean one amp is more capable than another, whether that's better would depend on whether your speakers are of such a design that need it. These make use of 8 high-current bipolar output transistors per channel! I would highly recommend a used Parasound HCA-2205AT. Being intended to accompany the new AVM series processors, the MCA 525 Gen 2 has a matching aesthetic, looking essentially identical to the AVMs, sans dial, buttons, and audio format markings. Parasound has a great name but with my AVM-708k this should be a perfect match. I hooked up my speakers via banana plugs, which fit snugly into the Anthems binding posts. This means it can deliver huge amounts of power instantly to any channel that demands it. I bought the Parasound Halo A52+. JavaScript is disabled. $11,495. For lower listening levels I prefer the tubed Anthem, but when needing to rock out a bit the PSound has the balls and headroom needed. amps-preamps 154516-93863 McIntosh 255 vs Parasound Halo A51 vs Anthem MCA 525 Looking to replace my Yamaha MX-A5000 with one of the above 5 Channel Amplifiers. It is outwardly elegant yet built like a tank. On paper, it looks like an MCA with a new face plate and a little bigger . A simple frequency measurement will not tell you much about how the speaker sounds, let alone that it sounds just like another based on such (but the measurements I doubt would be identical either). I don't care about footprint and I don't believe that the sound is better. No regrets so far with the Parasound. Obviously, the McIntosh is considerably more then the other two. No way am I going to a class D amp. While it's always nice to have the more capable amp, is it necessary? Hope many more users of these amps will chime in and provide their thoughts. I currently have the following system in my home theater: JavaScript is disabled. The 2205 has almost twice as large of a Toroidal Transformer (2.0 versus 1.2) and almost triple the Filter Capacitance (150,000uf versus 60,000) as the XPA-5. That sort of collaborate with 2X750 VA transformers. SNR, IEC-A, ref. The Rotel RMB-1585 that was recommended by another forum member here is also another great choice but I would go with the Parasound Halo A31 of A51 if I were you. ), My wish if I were a 30-40+ year old sealed LP - your latest NOS (New Old Stock) / sealed LP you bought, Dutton Vocalion - Surround SACDs from the UK, Multichannel Albums - Lossy Formats on DVD & CD. Do you find them fatiguing? The overall dimensions are (H x W x D) 169mm, 438mm, 460mm. It is a slightly more capable amp it seems. Used to match them with a Marantz AV7005 before that. The MCA 525 may cut out due to thermal protection if it gets too hot, and its just generally a bad idea to mix heat and electronics. I s'pose you could reproduce thunderclaps and jet engines realistically but you'd only be able to hear it a few times before you blow your eardrums into your sinuses .LOL 400wpc short on power with 101dB sensitivity at 12 feet. The A51 weighs more and is Class A / AB. 20% music, 80% Home Theater. Look at Anthems AVM60. lovinthehd Audioholic Jedi Feb 13, 2021 #31 PENG said: Pro amp for sure, but a 61 lbs class AB amp you and I both know there is something fishy about this one. Studio CC590. The new MCA xxx line appears to be more of a cosmetic effort to match the face plate aesthetics of the new AVM 60 than anything else to me. Really looking to compare something like the MCA-2 or MCA-20 to the HCA-1500a or HCA-2200ii. AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited, alternates were Cambridge Azur 851 and Halo A21 and Audio Research 150.2.Thanks mancub1 09-10-2017 10:39am None of this will tax the MCA 525. Anthem MCA 525 Gen 2 5-Channel Power Amplifier Review & Comments Doug Pyper Sep 25, 2022 Review Specs Discussion (27) 1 2 N nacdale Novice Member Nov 18, 2022 #26 Im really torn between this amp and the parasound A51 or A52+. what mods does ldshadowlady use in one life,

Lionfish And Sea Urchins, Articles A