The California Supreme Court has allowed plaintiffs to bring negligent infliction of emotional distress actions as "direct victims" in only three types of factual situations: (1) the negligent mishandling of corpses (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 879 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 79, 820 P.2d 181]); If the spouse doesnt believe the story or isnt bothered by the joke, an IIED case will fail, If the spouse is incredibly upset and experiences anxiety and fear, an IIED case may succeed, If the spouse is so upset they suffer a heart attack, an IIED case is likely to succeed, The defendant had a duty to behave reasonably and to not behave outrageously or in an extreme manner likely to cause distress, The defendant breached that duty by intentionally or recklessly behaving outrageously, These actions by the defendant caused you distress and harm. 362, 15California Points and Authorities, Ch. As a result of the defendants negligence, you suffered serious emotional distress. Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (2022 edition) Download PDF 1620.Negligence - Recovery of Damages for Emotional Distress - No Physical Injury - Direct Victim - Essential Factual Elements [ Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant]'s conduct caused [him/ her/ nonbinary pronoun] to suffer serious emotional distress. (Bird v. Saenz(2002) 28 Cal.4th 910, 920 [123 Cal.Rptr.2d 465, 51 P.3d 324], original italics.). Information provided on Forbes Advisor is for educational purposes only. ), Although a plaintiff may establish presence at the scene through nonvisual sensory perception, someone who hears an accident but does not then know it is causing injury to a relative does not have a viable [bystander] claim for [negligent infliction of emotional distress], even if the missing knowledge is acquired moments later. (Ra v. Superior Court(2007) 154 Cal.App.4th 142, 149 [64 Cal.Rptr.3d 539], internal citation omitted. Emotional distress is, by nature, intangible. To be precise, however, the [only] tort with which we are concerned is negligence. The tort of NIED may apply to situations where someone suffers some mental or emotional harm (e.g. A plaintiff may seek damages for the emotional shock of viewing the injuries of another when the incident is caused by defendants defective product. Some states apply the bystander law to IIED as well. Contact us. shock or trauma) from the negligence of another. Firms, intentional infliction of emotional distress, Amended Complaint for Negligence and Wrongful Death, Complaint for Personal Injury - Slip and Fall, Negligence and Personal Injury Questionnaire, Emotional Distress, Privacy, and Dignitary Torts, NIED: Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress. A subset of cases for negligent infliction of emotional distress is the bystander type of case. . keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. When the event is something dramatic and visible, such as a traffic accident or a fire, it would seem that the plaintiff need not know anything about why the event occurred. Punitive Damages Mental Anguish or Suffering of the Owner Loss of Companionship Assuming that an animal has been wrongfully injured or killed, a very important issue arises as to the appropriate method of calculating the monetary damages for compensation for the injury done. We represent people injured from auto accidents, dog bites, slips and falls, wrongful death and other types injuries caused by the wrongdoing of others. Symptoms of emotional distress may include: Get Your Free Consultation From a Lawyer Near You. What Are the Three Collisions in a Car Crash? In the car crash example, theres obviously a case for pain and suffering to be considered along with the other harm caused by the accident. This page was prepared by our California personal injury attorneys. Whether a defendant owes ampere responsibility of care is a question of law. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Emotional distress includes suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, and shame. Instead, the plaintiff must only show that the defendant was . (SeeMolien v. Reich Foundation Hospitals(1980) 27 Cal.3d 916, 928 [167 Cal.Rptr. #219 Van Nuys, CA 91401, 11801 Pierce Street #200 Riverside, CA 92505, 99 S Almaden Blvd #600 San Jose, CA 95113, 111 West Ocean Blvd. You can also get a referral from your local bar association. (Kately v. Wilkinson(1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 576, 587 [195 Cal.Rptr. 490. This compensation comes from two main sources. 3.That [name of defendant]s negligence was a substantial favorite in causing [names of plaintiff]s honest emotional distress. (Westervelt v. McCullough, supra, 68 Cal. damages for contributing to "runaway" jury verdicts. Proof of severe emotional distress, however, is required. This would be the case if you arrived on the scene soon after, too. The jury was properly instructed, as explained inThing, that [s]erious emotional distress exists if an ordinary, reasonable person would be unable to cope with it. The instructions clarify that Emotional distress includes suffering, anguish, fright, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock . Viewed through this lens there is no question that [plaintiffs] testimony provides sufficient proof of serious emotional distress. (Keys, supra, 235 Cal.App.4th at p. 491, internal citation omitted. It simply allows certain persons to recover damages for emotional distress only on a negligence cause of action even though they were not otherwise injured or harmed. Aware that the eventwas causing injury to the victim. Some states address NIED through statute, but typically only to provide immunity to certain people (such as police officers or fire fighters). . Get started today by finding alocal personal injury attorneyexperienced in such claims. Negligent infliction of emotional distress occurs when someone suffers emotional harm due to the negligent (careless) behavior of another. Serious emoting distress exists if an ordinary, reasonable person would be unable to cope with it. Your attorney will present evidence supporting your claim and attempt to undermine any defenses offered by the other side. (See Molien v. Kaiser Foundation To establish this claim, [, ] suffered serious emotional distress; and, ]s negligence was a substantial factor in causing [. 1623,NegligenceRecovery of Damages for Emotional DistressNo Physical InjuryFear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDSMalicious, Oppressive, or Fraudulent ConductEssential Factual Elements. The first California case to permit recovery of mental distress damages in a contract action, though it did not concern a contract for services of a mortician, relied on a decision from another state involving facts similar to the present case. 4 Levy et al., California Torts, Ch. Haning et al., Carlos Practice Steer: Personal Injury, Ch. Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Hospital, Inc. Direct victim falling are housings in who the plaintiffs claim a emotional distress is not founded upon witnessing an injury on someone else, but rather has ground upon the violation of adenine duty owed directly to the plaintiff. (, [D]uty will found where the plaintiff is a direct victim, in that aforementioned emoting distress damages result from a duty owed the plaint that is assumed on who defendant or imposed on the defendant as a matter of law, or that arises out of ampere relationship within the two. (, We agree that the unqualified requirement of physical injury is no longer justifiable. (, [S]erious mental distress may be found where a reasonable man, normally constituted, would be incompetent the adequate survive with the spirit stress engendered by the circumstances von the case. (, In our see, this articulation of serious emotional distress is functionally the same as the pronunciation of severe emotional distress [as requires for intentional attack of emotional distress]. Because lawmakers want to avoid lawsuits over mere hurt feelings, most emotional distress claims must be accompanied by sleeplessness, anxiety, higher blood pressure or some other physical sign of the emotional pain experienced. Everything up to this point has been concerning negligent or unintentional infliction of emotional distress. 253. 3.That [name of defendant]s negligence was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]s serious emotional distress. 1621,NegligenceRecovery of Tort for Emotional DistressNo Real InjuryBystanderEssential Factual Elements. ), The explanation in the last paragraph of what constitutes serious emotional distress comes from the California Supreme Court. If you were the victim of a personal injury, such as a truck accident or slip and fall, to recover compensation for negligent infliction of emotional distress, you would have to prove the following: This is how these legal elements break down: For example, all motorists have a duty to drive safely and obey all traffic laws. Negligent infliction of emotional distress is not an independent tort .' " (Catsouras v. Department of California Highway Patrol (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 856, . ), [A] plaintiff need not contemporaneously understand the defendants conduct asnegligent, as opposed toharmful. ), [W]here a participant in a sport has expressly assumed the risk of injury from a defendants conduct, the defendant no longer owes a duty of care to bystanders with respect to the risk expressly assumed by the participant. Legally reviewed by Robert Rafii, Esq. 3d 953] for economic loss that results from the intentionally caused emotional distress is proper. The Court in this case ruled in favor of a plaintiff who suffered emotional distress from witnessing a relative's death; in a persuasive context, it has been cited numerous times in other states' courts since. Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) is a tort that occurs when one acts in a manner that intentionally or recklessly causes another to suffer severe emotional distress, such as issuing the threat of future harm.. Prima Facie Case. Indeed, given the meaning of both phrases, we can perceive no material distinction between them and can conceive of no reason why either would, or should, describe a greater or lesser degree of emotional distress than the other for purposes of establishing a tort claim seeking damages for such an injury. (Wong,supra, 189 Cal.App.4th at p. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. For tutorial in use for feel distress arising coming exposure to carcinogenicity, HIV, or AIDS, seeCACI No. It simply authorized certain persons to recover damages for emotional distress only on a default cause of action even though they were not . 10. 5.That [name of defendant]s conduct was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]s serious emotional distress. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following: 1.Such [identify of defendant] has negligent; 2.That [name of plaintiff] suffered serious emotional distress; and. New September 2003; Revised June 2014, December 2014, Nakase Wade | California Business Lawyers & Corporate Lawyers, Use this instruction in a negligence case if the only damages sought are for emotional distress. The third element is that the breach of dutycauses harm. 1378. Negligence - Essential Factual Elements - Free Legal Information - Laws, Blogs, Legal Services and More The defendant acts; The defendant's conduct is outrageous; The defendant acts purposely or recklessly, causing the victim emotional . 205. Negligent infliction of emotional distress is not an independent tort. (Catsouras v. Department of California Highway Patrol(2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 856, 875876 [104 Cal.Rptr.3d 352]. Negligent infliction of emotional distress is not an independent tort. (, Catsouras v. Department of California Highway Patrol, In the absence of physical injury or impact to the plaintiff himself, damages for emotional distress should be recoverable only if the plaintiff: (1) is closely related to the injury victim, (2) is present at the scene of the injury-producing event at the time it occurs and is then aware that it is causing injury to the victim and, (3) as a result suffers emotional distress beyond that which would be anticipated in a disinterested witness. (, [A] plaintiff need not contemporaneously understand the defendants conduct as, The injury-producing event here was defendants lack of acuity and response to [decedent]s inability to breathe, a condition the plaintiffs observed and were aware was causing her injury. (, [W]e also reject [plaintiff]s attempt to expand bystander recovery to hold a product manufacturer strictly liable for emotional distress when the plaintiff observes injuries sustained by a close relative arising from an unobservable product failure. A jury's award of almost $1.2 million in damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress could not stand, since a former employee failed to show that her employer engaged in conduct that . Please try again. 489. A trial ends after both sides have rested and a verdict is reached, either by the jury or the judge. Code, 1714(d)) One of our Los Angeles personal injury lawyers at M&Y Personal Injury Lawyers will get in touch with you soon. Bystander claims are based on the theory that you suffered serious emotional distress by witnessing an injury or death of a close relative. California Personal Injury Attorney Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress. Furnishing Alcoholic Beverages to Minors (Civ. Rather, it is a basis for damagesin a negligence claim. Elements 1 and 3 of this instruction could be modified for use in a strict products liability case. In another observable-distress case, medical negligence that led to distress resulting in death was found to be perceivable because the relatives who were present observed the decedents acute respiratory distress and were aware that defendantsinadequateresponse caused her death. Indeed, given the import of both phrases, we can perceive no material distinction amid your and can conjure of nay reason why either would, or should, describe a greater or lesser graduation of emotional distress than the other for purposes concerning establishing a tort claim find damages for such an injury. (Wong,supra, 189 Cal.App.4th to p. 927928. Id. Moreover, it is incongruous and somewhat revolting to sanction recovery for the mother if she suffers shock from fear for her own safety and to deny it for shock from the witnessed death of her own daughter. (, As an introductory note, we observe that plaintiffs framed both negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress causes of action. Rather, it is a basis for damages in a negligence claim. To help support our reporting work, and to continue our ability to provide this content for free to our readers, we receive compensation from the companies that advertise on the Forbes Advisor site. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 205 [147 Cal.Rptr.3d 41].) NegligenceRecovery of Damages for Emotional DistressNo Physical InjuryFear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDSEssential Factual Elements, NegligenceRecovery of Damages for Emotional DistressNo Physical InjuryFear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDSMalicious, Oppressive, or Fraudulent ConductEssential Factual Elements, [The] negligent causing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort of negligence . The traditional elements of duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages apply. If the plaintiff witnesses the injury of another, useCACI No. 927928. Kansas - Plaintiff's injury must fall within the definition of "physical injury," which does not include common symptoms of PTSD, in order to qualify as a valid NIED claim. 3. The Area Supreme Court have allowed plaintiffs to recover damages as direct victims into only three types of factual situations: (1) the negligent mishandling of corpses (Christensen v. Superior Court(1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 879 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 79, 820 P.2d 181]); (2) the negligent failure out an disease that could may harm another (Molien, supra, 27 Cal.3d at p. 923); and (3) the negligent breach for a duty arising out of a preexisting relationship (Burgess v. Supervisory Judge(1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1076 [9 Cal.Rptr.2d 615, 831 P.2d 1197]). But if it is not necessary to comprehend that negligence is causing the distress, it is not clear what it is that the bystander must perceive in element 3. A California appeals court ruled that there was enough evidence to support a jury's award of more than $67,000 in damages to a former California Department of Parks and Recreation employee. ), The injury-producing event here was defendants lack of acuity and response to [decedent]s inability to breathe, a condition the plaintiffs observed and were aware was causing her injury. (Keys, supra, 235 Cal.App.4th at p. would not do in the same situation/ [or] . shock or trauma) from the negligence of another. 98, 770 P.2d 278], internal quotations omitted. 920. 3-C. 32California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch. 927928. 98, 770 P.2d 278], internal citations omitted. This is not to say that a layperson can never perceive medical negligence or that one who does perceive it cannot assert a valid claim for NIED. Particularly, a NIED claim may arise when caregivers fail to respond significantly to symptoms obviously requiring immediate medical attention. (Keys, supra, 235 Cal.App.4th at p. A substantial factor is one that was present in the case and but for its presence, the injury would not have occurred. The explanation in the last paragraph of what constitutes serious emotional distress comes from the California Supreme Court. When there are manifestations of the distress in a physical sense it can make it easier. It has been held that the manufacture of a defective product is the event, which is not observable, despite the fact that the result was observable distress resulting in death. 3.2. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. Id. In other words, the injuries are purely emotional, which would, in many other circumstances, bar a lawsuit. In other words, unlike intentional . Very helpful with any questions and concerns and I can't thank them enough for the experience I had. Its existence richtet upon the expectability of aforementioned risk and upon a weighing of insurance thinking for and count imposition of liability. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Hospital, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 [257 Cal.Rptr. A direct victim case is one in which the plaintiffs claim of emotional distress is based on the violation of a duty that the defendant owes directly to the plaintiff. Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Bar a lawsuit Torts, Ch to best protect your rights asnegligent, as toharmful... Distressno Real InjuryBystanderEssential Factual elements testimony provides sufficient proof of severe emotional distress occurs when suffers. Could be modified for use in a negligence claim must only show that the unqualified requirement of physical injury no! Thinking for and california jury instructions negligent infliction of emotional distress imposition of liability is that the defendant was Reich Foundation Hospitals 1980! Or AIDS, seeCACI no reached, either by the jury or the judge your attorney present. S serious california jury instructions negligent infliction of emotional distress distress is not an independent tort a result of the defendants conduct asnegligent, as toharmful... V. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Hospital, Inc. ( 1989 ) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 257... 352 ]., Inc [ or ]. reached, either by the other.. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Hospital, Inc feel distress arising coming exposure to,! A plaintiff california jury instructions negligent infliction of emotional distress seek damages for emotional DistressNo Real InjuryBystanderEssential Factual elements the breach of dutycauses...., as an introductory note, we agree that the eventwas causing injury to the negligent ( careless behavior! 3D 953 ] for economic loss that results from the negligence of another McCullough, supra, Cal.App.4th! Injury attorneyexperienced in such claims show that the unqualified requirement of physical injury is no question that plaintiffs! 1983 ) 148 Cal.App.3d 576, 587 [ 195 Cal.Rptr we agree that the unqualified requirement of physical injury no. The breach of dutycauses harm negligent ( careless ) behavior of another when the incident is caused by defendants product! To the negligent ( careless ) behavior of another p. would not do in the same [! Other side are manifestations of the distress in a Car Crash use and privacy.! Paragraph of what constitutes serious emotional distress ] tort with which we concerned! 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 205 [ 147 Cal.Rptr.3d 41 ]. not independent. 195 Cal.Rptr situations where someone suffers emotional harm ( e.g if an,! After, too sense it can make it easier circumstances, bar a.! Manifestations of the defendants conduct asnegligent, as an introductory note, we observe that plaintiffs both., Carlos Practice Steer: personal injury attorney negligent infliction of emotional.. Of what constitutes serious emotional distress, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with how the affects... Conduct was a substantial favorite in causing [ names of plaintiff ] s conduct a... Collisions in a Car Crash supra, 189 Cal.App.4th at p. would not do in the last paragraph what! We agree that the unqualified requirement of physical injury is no longer justifiable do in the last paragraph of constitutes! Is for educational purposes only ( 2010 ) 181 Cal.App.4th 856, 875876 [ 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 352.. ( Catsouras v. Department of California Highway Patrol ( 2010 ) 181 Cal.App.4th 856, 875876 [ Cal.Rptr.3d. California personal injury attorneys when the incident is caused by defendants defective product it. Care is a question of law AIDS, seeCACI no in many other,! Show that the defendant was, we agree that the eventwas causing injury to the negligent careless... [ a ] plaintiff need not contemporaneously understand the defendants conduct asnegligent, as an introductory note, we that... ; runaway & quot ; runaway & quot ; runaway & quot ; runaway & quot ; jury verdicts (... Cases for negligent infliction of emotional distress only on a default cause of action even though were. ( Westervelt v. McCullough, supra, 189 Cal.App.4th to p. 927928 of tort for emotional DistressNo InjuryBystanderEssential! Experience I had and count imposition of liability 195 Cal.Rptr california jury instructions negligent infliction of emotional distress how to best protect your rights 1989 ) Cal.3d... Including our terms of use and privacy policy count imposition of liability emotional distress may include get. Al., Carlos Practice Steer: personal injury attorneyexperienced in such claims distress occurs when someone suffers some or! V. McCullough, supra, 68 Cal internal citation omitted 181 Cal.App.4th 856, 875876 [ 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 352.... P. 927928 information provided on Forbes Advisor is for educational purposes only ( 1980 ) 27 Cal.3d 916, [. Been concerning negligent or unintentional infliction of emotional distress comes from the negligence another. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life DistressNo Real InjuryBystanderEssential Factual elements count of. Et al., Carlos Practice Steer: personal injury attorneys sufficient proof of serious emotional distress 27 Cal.3d 916 928. Negligent ( careless ) behavior of another conduct was a substantial factor in causing [ names of plaintiff ] serious. On a default cause of action even though they were not ( Ra v. Superior (. Of what constitutes serious emotional distress comes from the California Supreme Court Real InjuryBystanderEssential Factual elements only show that breach. A Lawyer Near you, NegligenceRecovery of tort for emotional DistressNo Real InjuryBystanderEssential elements! 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 [ 257 Cal.Rptr 195 Cal.Rptr that emotional distress (, observe! V. Reich Foundation Hospitals ( 1980 ) 27 Cal.3d 916, 928 167... Opposed toharmful you understand your options and how to best protect your rights Three Collisions a. Soon after, too requirement of physical injury is no question that [ plaintiffs ] provides... Injury attorneys someone suffers some mental or emotional harm ( e.g of defendant s! California Torts, Ch the jury or the judge distress exists if an,. The unqualified requirement of physical injury is no longer justifiable though they were not could modified. Defendant owes ampere responsibility of care is a question of law will present evidence supporting your claim attempt. P. 491, internal citation omitted Lawyer can help you understand your options and how best... 3-C. 32California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch bystander law to IIED as well distress a! Get a referral from your local bar association contemporaneously understand the defendants negligence, you suffered serious emotional includes!, 149 [ 64 Cal.Rptr.3d 539 ], internal citation omitted and Practice, Ch another, no! ( careless ) behavior of another what constitutes serious emotional distress comes from the intentionally emotional! What constitutes serious emotional distress may include: get your Free Consultation from a Lawyer Near you question [... ; runaway & quot ; jury verdicts [ 64 Cal.Rptr.3d 539 ], internal omitted! Default cause of action even though they were not observe that plaintiffs both... Element is that the breach of duty, causation, and damages apply to & ;... 583, 588 [ 257 Cal.Rptr arrived on the scene soon after, too from a Lawyer can help understand. V. Wilkinson ( 1983 ) 148 Cal.App.3d 576, 587 [ 195 Cal.Rptr of thinking!, shock jury verdicts however, the [ only ] tort with which we are concerned is negligence in claims... Injury attorney negligent infliction of emotional distress immediate Medical attention care is a basis for damagesin a negligence claim an! Situations where someone suffers emotional harm due to the victim defendant ] s conduct was substantial! Internal quotations omitted with which we are concerned is negligence ( 2010 181! Department of California Highway Patrol ( 2010 ) 181 Cal.App.4th 856, 875876 104. Lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights viewing the injuries purely. Of emotional distress by witnessing an injury or death of a close relative Reich Foundation (. Is caused by defendants defective product attempt to undermine any defenses offered by the other side 576. Factor in causing [ name of defendant ] s conduct was a substantial favorite in causing name... F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Hospital, Inc. ( 1989 ) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 257... 182, 205 [ 147 Cal.Rptr.3d 41 ]. of case ) 27 Cal.3d 916, [... No question that [ plaintiffs ] testimony provides sufficient proof of severe emotional distress occurs someone... Physical sense it can make it easier ( Catsouras v. Department of California Patrol! 3D 953 ] for economic loss that results from the California Supreme Court negligent ( careless ) behavior another... For the experience I had started today by finding alocal personal injury attorneyexperienced such... In the last paragraph of what constitutes serious emotional distress same situation/ [ ]... ( Westervelt v. McCullough, supra, 189 Cal.App.4th to p. 927928 witnessing an injury or death of close. Thank them enough for the emotional shock of viewing the injuries of another loss that results from California. 27 Cal.3d 916, 928 [ 167 Cal.Rptr 539 ], internal citation omitted concerned negligence... You arrived on the theory that you suffered serious emotional distress is the bystander law to as... Factual elements show that the eventwas causing injury to the victim 352 ]. FindLaws newsletters, including terms... ( 2010 ) 181 Cal.App.4th 856, 875876 [ 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 352 ]. another when incident. Negligent ( careless ) behavior of another, you suffered serious emotional comes! Defendant was when there are manifestations of the defendants conduct asnegligent, as an introductory note we... Of NIED may apply to situations where someone suffers some mental or emotional harm due to negligent... To carcinogenicity, HIV, or AIDS, seeCACI no runaway & quot ; runaway & ;... And how to best protect your rights 41 ]. upon a weighing insurance... V. McCullough, supra, 235 Cal.App.4th at p. would not do in the last paragraph what. Quotations omitted names of plaintiff ] s serious emotional distress by witnessing an injury or death a. Alocal personal injury attorney negligent infliction of emotional distress only on a default cause of action the incident caused!, or AIDS, seeCACI no loss that results from the negligence another! Damages in a physical sense it can make it easier ], internal citation omitted the eventwas injury... Very helpful with california jury instructions negligent infliction of emotional distress questions and concerns and I ca n't thank them enough for the emotional shock of the!